Case Study: How Supplier Choice Can Make or Break a Facade Project
To illustrate the importance of choosing the right supplier, consider this real-world inspired scenario from the Ukrainian market:
Project Background: A mid-rise commercial center in Kyiv was completed a few years ago with a modern metal facade. The developer had two options for suppliers: one was a well-known trusted supplier for metal facades (with certifications and a slightly higher price), and the other was a relatively unknown company offering a much lower bid. Unfortunately, to cut costs, the developer chose the cheaper, uncertified supplier for the facade panels.
Outcome with the Unreliable Supplier: Initially, the facade looked good at installation. However, within 3 years, problems became apparent. Rust-colored stains began seeping through the paint on several panels, especially at joints and edges. An inspection revealed that the panels’ protective zinc coating was far thinner than claimed – the supplier had not met the standard for galvanization, leaving the steel vulnerable to Ukraine’s humid autumns and road salt in winter. Essentially, the facade started corroding from the inside out, as the meager coating failed to protect the steel (confirming that it likely didn’t meet the 70 µm zinc thickness requirement for outdoor steel). Moreover, the lovely glossy paint began to fade and chalk. What was once a vibrant dark grey facade became patchy and dull. Laboratory tests of a removed panel showed the paint was an inferior polyester type with no UV stabilizers, explaining why it degraded so fast. To make matters worse, during a windy spring storm, several panels actually dislodged and fell from the third floor. Investigations pointed to subpar fastening brackets that had warped – a clear sign the supplier’s system wasn’t properly engineered for structural loads. In summary, the “cheap” facade supplier’s product lasted barely a few years before major failures. The building owner had to invest in emergency repairs, replacing many panels and reinforcing attachments at significant cost (not to mention the inconvenience and safety risk incurred).
Outcome with a Trusted Supplier (What Could Have Been): For comparison, a similar project in Lviv around the same time opted for a certified metal supplier in Ukraine for its facade – one with ISO 9001 processes and DSTU-compliant materials. That building’s ventilated facade uses galvanized steel cassettes with a durable PVDF finish. Five years on, the facade looks as pristine as day one. No rust is visible anywhere, thanks to proper galvanization and sealed edges. The color remains stable with no noticeable fading, since a high-end PVDF coating was used (warranted for 20 years). During extreme wind gusts last year, the facade held firm; the panels are securely interlocked on a robust subframe with no rattling. The supplier had provided detailed engineering for the anchors and profiles (including calculations per DBN wind loads), so the system withstands even above-normal wind pressures. The building owner reports zero issues – and any time there’s a question, the supplier is responsive and provides support. The slightly higher upfront cost for a quality supplier paid off immensely: maintenance costs have been near-zero, tenants are impressed with the building’s appearance, and the owner sleeps easier knowing the facade is safe and code-compliant.
Lesson Learned: This contrasting example demonstrates that supplier choice directly impacts the longevity and success of a facade. The project that saved money upfront is now paying double in repairs and replacements, not to mention facing reputational damage. The project that invested in a trusted, certified supplier enjoys peace of mind and long-term savings. As one construction manager succinctly put it, “We initially hesitated at the higher bid, but looking back, it was the best decision – our facade will easily last decades, proving the value of a trusted supplier for metal facades in Ukraine’s market.”